News and Updates on X
SudokuWiki.org
Strategies for Popular Number Puzzles
Solvers
Weekly 'Unsolvable'
Puzzles to Play
Basic Strategies
Tough Strategies
Diabolical Strategies
Extreme Strategies
Deprecated Strategies
Str8ts
Other
Print Version
Page Index

'The Logic of Sudoku' Resources Page

Introduction
Welcome to the "Logic of Sudoku" resource page.

To start with I have listed the exercises in the book with links to printable versions - in case you'd like to print them out instead of working in the book.

The second set of links are to my Step by Step solver for some of the puzzles and exercises in the book. This, I hope, will allow you to see the examples as the come about. In some cases some strategies might need to be turned off to allow the example to find the use of a particular strategy, but in most cases I have picked examples for the book that are necessary steps.

Any feedback or comments always appreciated.

Andrew Stuart

Printable Exercises The following are the exercise puzzles in the book. You can click on the links to get a printable version of each puzzle.



The following are the Sudoku puzzles in the book. You can click on the links to get a printable version of each puzzle or load the puzzle into Andrew Stuarts Step-by-Step solver

Corrections
Hidden Pairs - page 20
The sentence immediately under the diagram should read "1 and 5 occur in only two cells in box 2, but they are hidden by the 3 and 8 in C4 and the 3/7/8 in C6". Also the diagram 6.2 should show 1/5 in C4/C6, not 5/8.

Exercise 3 - Hidden Pairs
There is a small error on the exercise answer. One of the Hidden Pairs has been incorrectly highlighted. The fifth one, the {3/9} in box six is the correct Hidden Pair, not the {3/9} in box 8.
Correction to Exercise 3

Figure 22.2 on page 63
Unfortunately Figure 12.2 was substituted in place of the actual figure for 22.2. The real diagram is:

Figure 22.2

Table on page 123
The Extended Aligned Pair table on page 123 doesn't contain the strikethroughs which remove certain pair combinations and show how 3 can be removed. The corrected table is:
Table p123

Table on page 183
In the chapter 44, Killer strategies, is the list of cages with a unique combination of numbers. The correct table is here:
Unique Killer Cages
Note: Cages of size 7 were not included since they do not appear in most Killer Sudoku puzzles, but
41 = 2/4/5/6/7/8/9
42 = 3/4/5/6/7/8/9
A full list of all combinations is here: /Killer_Combinations.

If anyone wishes to comment, correct or contribute to these pages please feel free to contact me at andrew@sudokuwiki.org. I'm always interested to hear from other Sudoku fanatics.

Andrew Stuart

Exercise 5 - Simple Chain / Colouring

I've received some emails about the difference between the solver and the solution published as exercise 5 in the book. This diagram to the right is currently how the solver sees the situation.

Exercise 5
Exercise 5 : Load Example

The book shows the elimination at G2 which the solver also shows and I have drawn with blue lines. What is missing from the book solution is the other two eliminations based on different chains. But it must be remembered that Simple Chains and Simple Colouring are two sides to the same coin. The solver uses Colouring to get rid of as many candidates as possible in a single move - but each elimination can be justified by a different chain. The red and green eliminations (and the blue) occur because the 9 can see cells with different colours.

There is a problem with the solution to exercise 5 in that I have only shown one elimination out of a possible three using chains only. That I believe arose because my solver was a more primitive version at the time of writing the book and it wasn't giving me the full picture.


Comments

Your Name/Handle

Email Address - required for confirmation (it will not be displayed here)

Your Comment

Please enter the
letters you see:
arrow 		Enter these letters Remember me
Please ensure your comment is relevant to this article.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted - no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
CommentsTalk

... by: Kwesi

Tuesday 18-Jun-2013
Hi Andrew
Enjoying your book immensely, and have now reached Puzzle 15 p94. The clue given was that there was an AIC, which I failed to find, I put this into your convenient solver after hours head scratching, and at the point on which I was struggling I came across a Unique Rectangle type 2.
Since I had not come across one of these before, I read all about them in your book. and felt that I had understood them, and so returned back to puzzle 15 for a further head scratching session.
D1&E1 are the floor candidates and contain 4&9 the cells D7 & E7 contain respectively 459 & 46789 to avoid the dreaded pattern at least one candidate 4 or 9 must be removed from either cell E7 or D7 , now I cannot understand why 9 can be removed at E7. All the examples only show 3 candidates at the most in one cell , so how do we know which of the dreaded candidates must be removed.

Thanking you once again for the excellent book and hoping that you can provide me with enough information to bring me back to normality.
Kwesi
REPLY TO THIS POST

... by: Thos

Friday 26-Apr-2013
Puzzle 3, page 23, used to illustrate Hidden Triples has an alternative solution that instead uses a Naked Quad in column 2.
Andrew Stuart writes:
The exact order and way these early strategies are searched for has been tinkered with over the years so some examples in the book may solve in a different way. There are/were numerous reasons to update the approach over time. On triples/quads etc I think the main one was stopping one pair/triple/quad generating another in the same step. I was knock on effects to be separate steps so even though several or many pairs/triples/quads can be found in one step they should be independent of each other. That was not true when the book was compiled
Add to this Thread

... by: Thos

Wednesday 24-Apr-2013
In case of the Exercise 5 discussed above there are further discrepancies between the diagram in the book and the display shown here. For example, the cells C3 and C7 are not shaded (coloured) in the book and cells F1, H2 and H9 are shaded in the book and not in the updated diagram. Also candidates 9 in cells F3 and G9 above are omitted in the book.

Also, in the diagram for Exercise 2 on p. 19 some candidate elimination has already been performed, e.g. 6 in F6 by the pair in A6, C6 and 7 in B7 by the pair in F7, H7.
REPLY TO THIS POST

... by: Bizman

Saturday 23-Mar-2013
On your resources list of puzzles above you have two number 26, but no number 27. Obviously the second one should be 27.
REPLY TO THIS POST

... by: Tony Minchin

Monday 4-Feb-2013
Andrew Stuart - In your excellent book, at 12 Sword-Fish:
P12 'dependant' (noun) should be 'dependent' (adjective).
P36 'This clears all [the other] 6s in column 9 ...'
P38 'In Fig 12.3 the sudoku board has, in total, three 5s in three rows..' ?in total, six 5s?
P38 fourth para - '1, 5 and 8 will [have] 5 as the solution..'
p39 The rule 'When there are: only three possible cells for a value..' But p38 at bottom said it could be 2 cells, 3 cells, 2 cells (not just 3,3,3) . And could it also be 3,3,2?
Andrew Stuart writes:
Thanks for the addendum notes. If there is a new edition I'll be starting with new puzzles and examples and new typos. I did get the book proofed by a very profession person who did a great job. But then the publisher said I could have 50 more pages for no extra cost, so I got to write more and put more in - hence the typos in some sections. Appreciate the list and glad you are enjoying the book
Add to this Thread

... by: erik niebuhr

Tuesday 15-Jun-2010
Dear Andrew Stuart,
I am a beginner in Sudoku, just got your book (logic of S, exellent) but I have a problem with Exercise 2 (Quad, p19): In your answer (p209) you write that the quad of 2/6/7/9 removes the 2 in H2, there is no 2 in H2, it must be the 2 in H1, which means, that 2 should be placed in H3 ?? and thus no quad in row H.
By the way, assuming the quad in column 1, I would remove 2/6/7/9 in B1 (and not only 2/7/9 as you suggest), together with 2 in H2 and 6/9 in J1, correct ?? Kind regards erik (denmark)
REPLY TO THIS POST

... by: Tom Ledwidge

Tuesday 25-Aug-2009
Regarding the simple chain/colouring method I use + or- instead of two different colours to avoid having coloured pens available.

I received your excellent book today and read it cover to cover.
Tom
REPLY TO THIS POST

... by: Marwan Gharaibeh

Sunday 19-Jul-2009
Dear Mr. Stuart,,

Hi. I had your excellent book "The logic of Sudoku" and I am proud to say that in addition to the solver on the internet it has helped me reach the highest levels of solving. now the only puzzles I look for are the diabolical, sadistic and develish.

In page 100 , fig 29.3 of your book you talked about the ALS in the figure, but you didn't deal with (2) as a common restricted number for the two sets. in my understanding I see it as common restricted and I don't beleive that your definition applies to it, so why remove the (2)'s from A6 and C6?

May I bother you to respond to this please.

sincerely yours.

Marwan Gharaibeh
United Arab Emirates
Andrew Stuart writes:
Hi Marwan
In Figure 29.3, 2 is not restricted common. It is present in A4 and C4. Only 1 is restricted common since 1 is the only candidate with the property that is is (a) present is both sets and (b) all occurances can be seen by both sets. Therefore it will be used in one or other set but not both. The 2 in B4 qualifies, but is disqualified by the 2s in A4 and C4 - since these cannot see the other ALS in B6.
Hope that helps
Add to this Thread

... by: Richard Kretzschmar

Monday 1-Jun-2009
Concerning the Exercise 6 Answer-Multi-Colouring, how did you determine the shade sequence for the second chain? Assuming the shades for the 4 cell chain on the left, what is the logic for determining the shade, i.e. + or -, for the 3 cell chain on the right? What would the solution be if the + and - were reversed in the 3 cell chain? Bottom line, is there a logical sequence for deciding where to start the second chain and with what symbol (or shade)?

Thanks.
Andrew Stuart writes:
Hi Richard

There is a correct way of allocating the + or -. Of the three cells in the second chain two can 'see' the other chains. These are the + cells, which in this case are E8 and J7. G8, the '-' cell can't see any cell in the first chain. To rephase the rule - if some A+ and B+ cells can see each other (which they can and we thus lable them '+') and the A- and B- cells can't see each other (which they can't - and thus we lable them '-') then all N that can see both A- and B- can be removed.

I know at first site it seems chicken and egg, but you looking out for what parts of the chain are visible to parts of other chains.
Add to this Thread
Article created on 13-April-2008. Views: 55972
This page was last modified on 5-July-2009.
All text is copyright and for personal use only but may be reproduced with the permission of the author.
Copyright Andrew Stuart @ Syndicated Puzzles, Privacy, 2007-2024